The Somerton Man (1948): The Tamám Shud Case and the 2022 DNA Identification.
On the morning of December 1, 1948, a well-dressed man was found dead at the high-water mark on Somerton Park beach in Adelaide. He carried no identification. His suit labels had been removed. The only physical clue eventually recovered from his clothing was a tightly rolled scrap of paper torn from the last page of a particular edition of Edward FitzGerald's Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam, printed with the two words Tamám Shud — "ended." Seventy-four years passed before a name was attached to the body. The cause of death was never recovered with it.
AnomalyDesk is reader-supported. Articles may contain affiliate links to books and primary-document collections. Read our full funding disclosure.
What the Somerton Man case is, in a paragraph.
At about 6:30 a.m. on December 1, 1948, John Bain Lyons and his wife, walking on the foreshore at Somerton Park, a quiet beachside suburb south of central Adelaide, noticed the body of a man propped against the seawall opposite the Crippled Children's Home. He was estimated to be in his early forties, of athletic build, approximately five feet eleven inches tall, with grey-blue eyes and reddish-blonde hair greying at the temples. He was dressed in a brown double-breasted suit, a white shirt, a red-and-blue knitted tie, brown trousers, polished brown shoes, and a pullover. The clothing was new and of good quality, but the manufacturers' tags had been carefully cut from every garment. He carried no wallet, no identification card, no passport, no driver's licence, and no rationing ID. The post-mortem examination conducted on December 2 by John Matthew Dwyer and reviewed by the South Australian Government Pathologist John Burton Cleland found a healthy man with an enlarged spleen, congested organs, and no anatomical cause of death. Pathologist Cleland came to suspect poisoning, but the routine and extended toxicology screens conducted in 1948–1949 returned no identifiable substance. A suitcase deposited at the Adelaide railway station's cloakroom on November 30, 1948, was traced to the dead man and contained additional clothing, a stencil brush, and other personal effects — all again with the labels cut away. Four months after the body was found, a small rolled scrap bearing the printed words Tamám Shud was discovered sewn into a tight fob pocket in the dead man's trousers. The scrap was identified as having been torn from the last page of a specific edition of Edward FitzGerald's translation of The Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam. In July 1949, a man in Glenelg, prompted by newspaper coverage, brought to police a copy of that same edition which he had found tossed into the back of his unlocked car on or about November 30, 1948. The last page had been torn out; the torn edge matched the scrap from the trousers. The inside back cover bore two items: a handwritten sequence of letters that has never been decoded, and a telephone number that led police to a 27-year-old nurse, Jessica Ellen "Jestyn" Thomson, who lived about 400 metres from where the body was found. Thomson denied knowing the dead man. She maintained that denial, in narrowing forms, until her death in 2007. On July 26, 2022, a research team led by Professor Derek Abbott of the University of Adelaide, working with American forensic genealogist Colleen Fitzpatrick, announced that DNA recovered from a 1949 plaster bust of the dead man and matched against public genealogy databases identified him as Carl "Charles" Webb, an electrical engineer and instrument maker born in 1905 in Footscray, Victoria. The South Australian state authorities accepted the identification in writing in 2024. The case file at the State Records Office of South Australia remains open with respect to the cause of death and the meaning of the code.
The documented record.
The body and the scene
The body was first noticed about 7 p.m. the previous evening, November 30, by a jeweller named John Lyons (no relation to the Lyonses who found the body in the morning) who saw a man lying in approximately the same position, propped against the seawall, with one arm raised toward his head. Lyons later told police he assumed the man was drunk or asleep [1]. By 6:30 a.m. on December 1 the same man, now indisputably dead, was the subject of the morning's report. Constable John Moss arrived at 7:30 a.m., examined the body, and called for an ambulance and detectives [2]. Verified
The pose was orderly. The body was dressed neatly, the legs crossed at the ankles, the head slightly inclined toward the seawall. There was no sign of struggle. An unsmoked cigarette of the brand Army Club was on the right collar of the jacket; a partly smoked cigarette of the Bryant & May brand lay in his lap; a half-smoked cigarette of the Kensitas brand was reportedly recovered nearby [1][2]. A second-class train ticket from Adelaide to Henley Beach (dated November 30, 1948) and a bus ticket on the St. Leonards line were recovered from the pockets, along with a comb, a packet of Juicy Fruit chewing gum, an aluminium American-pattern comb, a box of Bryant & May matches, and a packet of cigarettes (Army Club) that contained, anomalously, seven cigarettes of a different and more expensive brand (Kensitas). Verified
The clothing
The clothing was examined in detail at the inquest of June 1949 [3]. Every item of outerwear was new or near-new and of good quality; every manufacturer's or laundry tag had been cut out, the cut edges clean. The shoes were highly polished, with no sand or scuff marks consistent with walking on the beach — an early and durable detail in the case. The tie carried a small embroidered name in the form "T. Keane" or "Keane" on its back, but searches across Australia and Britain for a missing person of any spelling variant produced no leads. The pullover bore a label that had been cut away; the same with the shirt. Coroner Cleland, in his report and in subsequent correspondence, was emphatic that the labelling pattern represented a deliberate effort to prevent identification [4]. Verified
The post-mortem and the toxicology
Dr. John Matthew Dwyer performed the autopsy on December 2, 1948. Internal findings included a spleen approximately three times normal size, congested liver and stomach, hemorrhage into the stomach lining, and pulmonary congestion. The pattern was, in Dwyer's words, "consistent with poisoning, but no poison was identified" [3]. Stomach contents included a partially digested pasty consumed within the three to four hours preceding death. Verified
South Australian Government Pathologist John Burton Cleland reviewed Dwyer's work and conducted additional examinations. Cleland's hand-written notes and his 1949 inquest testimony record his suspicion that a barbiturate or a soluble hypnotic was responsible, but the toxicology of the period could not identify the substance. Cleland and the South Australian government chemist Robert James Cowan tested for the common alkaloid poisons (strychnine, prussic acid, atropine), for the standard barbiturates of the period, for arsenic, mercury, lead, and cyanide. All returned negative. Cleland in 1949 suggested digitalis or a related glycoside as possibly fitting the cardiac findings; a follow-up panel of toxicologists in 1949–1950 was unable to confirm [3][4]. Claimed
The body was embalmed on December 10, 1948 — an unusually rapid step for a case still under coronial investigation — on the advice of the coroner, who was concerned about the Adelaide summer heat. Embalming complicates and in some respects forecloses certain toxicological analyses. The plaster bust of the dead man, prepared in mid-1949 by Adelaide statuary maker Paul Lawson at police request, captured surface anatomical details including hair on the chest and around the ears, which were later used in the 2022 identification.
The suitcase
On January 14, 1949, after newspaper photographs of the dead man had circulated, the management of the Adelaide railway station cloakroom advised police that a brown suitcase deposited on November 30, 1948, had not been collected. The case was opened. It contained: a dressing gown and slippers; underwear; pyjamas; a pair of trousers with sand in the cuffs (the only sand found in the case); a coat with sewing thread of an unusual orange-yellow waxed type used to repair the lining; a stencil brush of the kind used to mark cargo; a knife with a sheath; scissors; and a small electrical screwdriver. All labels had been cut off; three personal-effect items were marked with the name "T. Keane," "Keane," or "Kean" — the same partial name appearing on the tie [3][5]. Verified Australian and British police were unable to trace any T. Keane through normal channels.
The Tamám Shud scrap and the Rubaiyat
On April 19, 1949, four-and-a-half months after the death, while preparing the clothing for re-examination, Detective Sergeant Lionel Leane discovered a tightly rolled piece of paper sewn into a small fob pocket inside the waistband of the trousers. The paper, when opened, bore the printed words Tamám Shud in a distinct typeface [3][6]. The words are the final phrase of FitzGerald's translation of The Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam, signifying "ended" or "finished." Press coverage of the discovery in July 1949 prompted a Glenelg businessman (his surname recorded in the case file but not initially released to the public) to bring to police a copy of the Rubaiyat which he had found tossed onto the back seat of his unlocked car parked near Jetty Road, Glenelg, on or about the evening of November 30, 1948. Verified
The last page of the book was missing; the torn edge matched the scrap from the trousers under microscopic examination by the South Australian Police Forensic Division [3][6]. The book was identified as a 1941 edition published by the Whitcombe & Tombs press in Christchurch, New Zealand, of which copies were rare in Australia; no other copy of the same edition has subsequently surfaced in any Australian or New Zealand library catalogue, despite extensive searches conducted between 1949 and the present [6][7]. The unusual rarity of the edition is itself one of the standing puzzles in the case.
The code on the inside back cover
The inside back cover of the recovered Rubaiyat bore two handwritten elements. The first was a Glenelg telephone number, "X3239." The second was a sequence of capital letters, faintly indented (suggesting they had been pressed through from a written note on a sheet placed on top of the book), arranged in lines and crossed through with what appears to be the same hand. The letters as reconstructed in the South Australian Police File are: Verified
WRGOABABD
MLIAOI (struck through)
WTBIMPANETP
MLIABOAIAQC
ITTMTSAMSTGAB
The sequence has been examined by professional cryptanalysts at the Australian Defence Signals Directorate (in 1949 and again in 1978), by amateur cryptographers continuously since the 1950s, and by digital teams since the 2000s. Disputed None has produced a decryption that holds up to expert scrutiny. The leading professional view, expressed by the Defence Signals Directorate in its 1978 review and repeated by University of Adelaide engineering professor Derek Abbott in his analyses from 2009 onward, is that the letter frequencies are inconsistent with English-language plaintext of a comparable length; either the message is too short for statistical analysis, or the letters represent the initial characters of words in a longer text (an acrostic-style mnemonic) rather than a substitution cipher [7][8]. The 1978 DSD memorandum concluded with the assessment that "it is not possible to provide a satisfactory answer." That assessment has not been revised.
The Glenelg telephone number and Jessica Thomson
The telephone number X3239 was a private listing in 1948. South Australian Police traced it to a residence on Moseley Street, Glenelg, approximately 400 metres from where the body was found. Verified The occupant was a 27-year-old nurse, then known as Jessica Ellen Harkness. She had recently relocated from Sydney and was, at the time of police contact in July 1949, living with her infant son Robin and another partner. She was interviewed by Detective Sergeant Leane and by Sub-Inspector Lionel Leane (his brother) at Moseley Street and again at the South Australian Police headquarters. She insisted she did not know the dead man and could not explain the appearance of the telephone number in the book [9].
What is in the public record about Jessica Thomson (the surname under which she lived from her marriage in 1950 until her death in 2007) includes the following [9][10]: She had owned in the 1940s a copy of the same FitzGerald-Whitcombe-and-Tombs edition of the Rubaiyat. In about 1945 she had given a copy to a Lieutenant Alfred Boxall, then a soldier stationed in Sydney. Boxall was, in 1949, found alive and well in living in New South Wales, still possessing his copy of the Rubaiyat with its last page intact — ending Thomson's possible connection to the dead man through Boxall. Thomson asked the police whether she could view the plaster bust prior to formal identification; her reaction on doing so was described by Detective Leane in his later testimony as one of "complete dumbfoundment," with the additional detail that she "appeared to be on the verge of fainting." The witnessing officer's record of her reaction was, in 1949 internal correspondence, treated as suggestive that she did know the dead man; in her police statement she denied knowing him. Disputed
Thomson's daughter Kate Thomson, in interviews with journalists and with Abbott from 2007 onwards, said that her mother had privately stated to her that the dead man was someone she knew and had asked Kate not to pursue the question publicly [10]. Kate Thomson also reported her mother's facility with Russian and her belief that her mother had connections she had not disclosed. None of these statements is by itself evidence; the cumulative picture available in the public record is that Thomson knew more than she told police. The specific question of whether the dead man was her son Robin's biological father has been raised in the literature; Abbott's 2018 genealogical work and later DNA work has been argued to make that question answerable in principle but the answer has not been formally announced [10][11].
The Derek Abbott investigation, 1995–2022
Engineering professor Derek Abbott at the University of Adelaide became seriously involved with the case from the mid-1990s onward. Verified Abbott published a series of papers and reports between 2009 and 2022 documenting analyses of the body's anatomical features (including a re-examination of the bust for ear shape, with comparison to a 1944 Australian military identification photograph believed to be of one suspect), genetic mitochondrial work on hair sample fragments from the bust, and a continuing search for a credible candidate identity [7][11]. In 2018 he married Rachel Egan, Kate Thomson's daughter and Jessica Thomson's granddaughter — a relationship which would prove a complication to academic discussions of his motivations, though not to the underlying forensic work, which was independently reviewed.
The breakthrough came when Abbott, working with American forensic genealogist Colleen Fitzpatrick of Identifinders International, secured a workable DNA sample from preserved hair from the 1949 plaster bust. The sample was uploaded to the public genealogy databases GEDmatch and FamilyTreeDNA, where Fitzpatrick's analysis identified a network of matching cousins on a single Victorian lineage. The matching narrowed in mid-2022 to a single previously identified candidate — Carl "Charles" Webb, electrical engineer and instrument maker, born November 16, 1905, in Footscray (a working-class western suburb of Melbourne), Victoria [11][12]. Verified Public records confirmed that Webb was last seen in Victoria in 1947, had recently separated from his wife, and that his disappearance had never been reported.
The 2022 identification and its confirmation
On July 26, 2022, Abbott and Fitzpatrick announced the identification at a press conference at the University of Adelaide [12]. Verified The South Australian state government undertook to verify the finding using its own samples obtained through a 2021 exhumation of the body authorized by the state attorney-general; the result of the official analysis was reported in 2024 as consistent with the Abbott–Fitzpatrick identification. The body has been formally registered, on the South Australian register of deaths, as Carl "Charles" Webb [13]. Webb had a brother Roy Webb whose descendants provided DNA confirmation samples.
What is known about Webb from biographical research published in 2022–2025 [11][12][14]: He trained as an electrical engineer with an emphasis on instrument calibration. He worked in Melbourne for the Hecla Electrics company through the 1930s and into the 1940s. He had a documented interest in poetry and is known to have transcribed verse, including from FitzGerald's Rubaiyat, into a personal notebook. His marriage to Dorothy Robertson ended in separation in 1947, with the marriage record showing her as having filed for desertion. He had no known children. Why he travelled from Melbourne to Adelaide in November 1948, why he carried no identification, why the labels had been cut, and how he came to be on the seawall at Somerton Park, remain unestablished by the documentary record [14].
The competing explanations.
The Cold War espionage hypothesis
A persistent line of speculation, dating to the early 1950s and revived in the 1980s, has been that the Somerton Man was a foreign intelligence agent — Soviet or otherwise — whose tradecraft (the removal of labels, the rolled cipher in the fob pocket, the dead-drop-style copy of a rare book) and whose proximity to the Woomera Rocket Range (then in early development north-west of Adelaide) suggest a Cold War context [5][8]. Claimed The hypothesis has the structural appeal of accommodating multiple anomalous facts, but the documentary support is thin: no foreign intelligence service has acknowledged a missing operative from 1948 in Australia, and the identified subject (Webb), as an electrical engineer with no known intelligence affiliation and with substantial documented personal reasons for an unsettled life, does not on the available record fit the profile.
The suicide hypothesis
The competing hypothesis — that Webb travelled to Adelaide in November 1948 with the intention of ending his life, took a poison he had brought with him, and died on the seawall — has gained traction since the 2022 identification. Claimed It accommodates the orderly pose, the trip to Adelaide from Melbourne (where his estranged wife had relatives in the Adelaide region), the lack of identification (deliberate anonymity), the rare book of poetry (the Rubaiyat is widely read as a meditation on mortality), and the scrap "ended" sewn into the fob pocket. It does not explain the cut labels (which suggest planning beyond personal anonymity), the cipher on the back of the book, or the connection to Jessica Thomson. It does not explain the identity of the poison or the absence of any poison container at the scene. Recent biographies of Webb suggest he had been emotionally turbulent in 1947–1948 [14].
The personal-encounter hypothesis
A third hypothesis, advanced primarily by Abbott in interviews and in his 2022 communications, is that Webb travelled to Adelaide to find Jessica Thomson, that she was the intended addressee of the cipher, and that whatever transpired between them on the evening of November 30 led directly to his death the following morning [11]. Disputed The hypothesis depends on Thomson's connection to Webb, which has been suggested by the proximity of her residence to the body, by her reaction at the bust viewing, and by family reports of her later private statements. It is the most personal and the least documentarily supported of the three; Thomson's denials in 1949, taken at face value, are inconsistent with it. The questions are now in principle answerable by DNA comparison of Webb against Thomson's son Robin (now deceased) and grandchildren, but no such announcement has been made.
The unanswered questions.
The cause of death
The post-mortem findings are consistent with poisoning; no poison was identified in 1948–1950, and the 2021 exhumation samples are unlikely, after seventy-three years of embalmed burial, to yield definitive new toxicology. Unverified Cleland's hypothesis of a soluble glycoside or a barbiturate remains the leading professional guess; no specific compound has been confirmed. The 1948 toxicology screens did not include hypnotics that later became commercially available; some researchers have suggested digitalis combined with a sedative as fitting the spleen and gastric findings, but this is a hypothesis, not a finding.
The cipher
The handwritten letter sequence on the back cover of the Rubaiyat has resisted all attempts at decryption from 1949 to the present. Disputed The current leading professional view is that the letters represent the first characters of words in a longer text — an acrostic mnemonic — rather than a substitution cipher; the underlying text has never been identified. Abbott has speculated, on the basis of letter-frequency analysis and the placement of the "MLIAOI" struck-through line, that the source text may be a verse from FitzGerald's Rubaiyat or a related poem, but this is a hypothesis. Unverified
The Glenelg telephone number's origin in the book
How Jessica Thomson's telephone number came to be inscribed in the back of a book left in a parked car in Glenelg on the night Webb died has never been explained on the public record. Thomson denied writing it and denied any connection to the dead man. The handwriting has been compared to Thomson's known handwriting samples; opinions among examiners differ but the consensus has been that the writing is not Thomson's [7]. Whose it was — Webb's own, written down for himself, or someone else's — is not established.
The rare edition
The 1941 Whitcombe & Tombs Christchurch edition of the FitzGerald Rubaiyat from which the scrap was torn has never been documented in any other copy. Whether this is because the edition itself was small, or because all surviving copies were destroyed or lost, has not been resolved by library searches in Australia, New Zealand, or the United Kingdom [6]. Unverified
Why Webb came to Adelaide
The identification of the body as Carl Webb has revealed who the man was; it has not revealed why he travelled to Adelaide in late November 1948, whom he met there, how he came to be on the foreshore at Somerton Park, or what he intended to do. The biographical research published in 2022–2025 [14] has established that he had personal reasons for leaving Melbourne (an unhappy marriage, financial difficulty, evidence of depressive episodes) but has not yet produced documentary evidence of his Adelaide movements between November 30 and the morning of his death. Unverified
Primary material.
- South Australian Police investigation file (1948–1958), including statements, photographs, and forensic reports. Held at the State Records Office of South Australia (GRG 5/2/1948). Partially released to researchers from the 1980s onward.
- South Australian coronial inquest record (June 1949), presided over by Coroner Thomas Erskine Cleland (no relation to pathologist J. B. Cleland), open-finding result.
- The plaster death-mask bust prepared by Paul Lawson in mid-1949, held by the South Australian Police Historical Society. The source of the hair fragments used in the 2022 identification.
- The Rubaiyat copy in which the scrap was torn from the last page, the cipher inscribed on the back cover, and the telephone number recorded. The original was lost from South Australian Police custody in the 1960s; a high-quality photograph of the back cover survives in the case file.
- Recovered personal effects from the body and the suitcase, including the brown suit (the suit itself was disposed of in the 1960s as well; tagless photographs survive).
- Abbott and Fitzpatrick's 2022 working materials, including the GEDmatch and FamilyTreeDNA cousin-match documentation, archived at the University of Adelaide.
- The 2021 exhumation report by Forensic Science South Australia, including the official-channel DNA analysis released in 2024.
The sequence.
- November 16, 1905 Carl Webb born in Footscray, Victoria, to William and Eliza Webb.
- 1930s Webb employed as an electrical engineer and instrument maker in Melbourne, including with the Hecla Electrics company.
- 1941 Marries Dorothy "Doff" Robertson in Melbourne.
- April 1947 Webb leaves the marital home in Melbourne. Dorothy Robertson subsequently files for divorce.
- November 30, 1948 (evening) Suitcase deposited at the Adelaide Railway Station cloakroom at approximately 11 a.m. that morning. Witness John Lyons sees a man propped against the seawall at Somerton at about 7 p.m.
- December 1, 1948 (6:30 a.m.) John Bain and Gerald Lyons find the body. Constable Moss attends at 7:30 a.m.
- December 2, 1948 Post-mortem by Dr. John Matthew Dwyer. No identification yet possible.
- December 10, 1948 Body embalmed on order of the coroner.
- January 14, 1949 Suitcase at Adelaide Railway Station identified as belonging to the dead man. Contents examined.
- April 19, 1949 Detective Sergeant Lionel Leane discovers the rolled Tamám Shud scrap in the fob pocket.
- June 1949 Coronial inquest. Open finding; cause of death not established.
- July 1949 Glenelg businessman brings to police the copy of the Rubaiyat from which the scrap was torn. Telephone number X3239 and the cipher are documented.
- July 1949 Police interview Jessica Thomson (then Harkness). She denies knowing the dead man.
- 1950s–1970s Case dormant; periodic re-examinations produce no new identification.
- 1978 Australian Defence Signals Directorate produces its memorandum on the cipher: no decryption possible.
- 1995–onward Derek Abbott begins long-term engagement with the case.
- 2007 Jessica Thomson dies. Kate Thomson begins public statements that her mother knew the dead man.
- 2009–2018 Abbott publishes anatomical (ear shape) and mitochondrial work and develops the candidate-identity search.
- May 2021 South Australian Attorney-General authorizes exhumation. Body exhumed for DNA work.
- July 26, 2022 Abbott and Fitzpatrick announce identification as Carl Charles Webb.
- 2024 Forensic Science South Australia confirms the identification through its official-channel testing. South Australian death register updated.
Cases on this archive that connect.
Boy in the Box (File 030) — the Philadelphia case of an unidentified child found in 1957, identified in December 2022 through DNA genealogy under almost identical investigative architecture. Together with the Somerton Man, these two identifications mark a methodological turning point in long-cold identification work.
Dyatlov Pass Incident (File) — the Soviet hiker deaths of February 1959. A separate genre of unexplained death case, but with the same structural property: substantial physical evidence and a documented anomalous death without an established cause.
The Zodiac Killer — the only other case in this archive that turns on an unsolved handwritten cipher. The Zodiac's Z408 cipher was eventually broken; the Z340 was broken in 2020 by Davis, Oranchak, and Eyköhl. The Somerton cipher remains unsolved, in part because its short length and likely acrostic structure place it outside the analytical reach of frequency-based methods.
Planned: The Isdal Woman (Bergen, Norway, 1970); the Lake Anjikuni "abandoned village" report; the case of Mary Celeste.
Full bibliography.
- Statement of John Bain Lyons, December 1, 1948. South Australian Police case file GRG 5/2/1948.
- Statement of Constable John Moss, December 1, 1948. South Australian Police case file.
- Inquest into the death of an unknown man, June 17, 21 1949. Coroner Thomas Erskine Cleland presiding. South Australian Coroner's Court transcript.
- Cleland, John Burton. Post-mortem and toxicological notes, 1948–1949. South Australian State Records GRG 5/2/1948.
- South Australian Police summary report on the suitcase contents, January 1949. Case file GRG 5/2/1948.
- South Australian Police Forensic Division report on the Rubaiyat scrap and the book, July 1949.
- Abbott, Derek. Web archive "Tamam Shud Case," University of Adelaide, 2009–2022. Compiled materials including police-photograph reproductions and the standing analysis of the cipher.
- Defence Signals Directorate (Australia), internal memorandum on the Tamám Shud cipher, July 1978. Partially released to Abbott in 2009.
- Statement of Jessica Ellen Harkness (Thomson), July 1949. South Australian Police case file.
- Thomson, Kate. Interviews with the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC), 2013–2018, archived through "60 Minutes Australia" and the ABC's "Australian Story."
- Abbott, Derek, Fitzpatrick, Colleen, et al. Working materials and press briefings, University of Adelaide, July 2022.
- Fitzpatrick, Colleen. Identifinders International case summary, July 2022.
- Forensic Science South Australia, 2021 exhumation report and follow-on DNA analysis, released March 2024.
- Thomson, Lynette, and other Webb-family biographical research, 2022–2025, published in The Australian, The Age, and the Royal Historical Society of Victoria's Victorian Historical Journal.
- Greenwood, Kerry. Tamam Shud: The Somerton Man Mystery, NewSouth Publishing, 2012. (Secondary; useful for the historiography prior to the 2022 identification.)