File 338 · Open (haunting regarded as hoax)
Case
The Amityville Horror
Pillar
Unexplained Events
Period
Murders November 1974; haunting claims from December 1975
Location
112 Ocean Avenue, Amityville, Long Island, New York
Status
Mixed. The 1974 DeFeo murders are real and documented. The subsequent “haunting” reported by the Lutz family is widely regarded as a hoax or gross exaggeration; the defense lawyer involved later said the story was concocted, and subsequent residents reported nothing unusual.
Last update
July 18, 2026

The Amityville Horror: A Real Murder House, and a Manufactured Haunting.

It is the most famous haunted house in America, the seed of a publishing and film empire. At its center are two very different things: a genuine, horrifying mass murder, and a ghost story that the people closest to it have said was invented. Keeping those two apart is the whole task of the file.

AnomalyDesk is reader-supported. Articles may contain affiliate links to books and primary-document collections. Read our full funding disclosure.

Confidence key — claims in this file are tagged as follows Verified primary documentary support · Claimed asserted by a named party, not independently confirmed · Disputed credible sources contradict each other · Unverified we could not substantiate it · how we decide

What the Amityville Horror is, in a paragraph.

The Amityville Horror refers to the claimed haunting of a Dutch Colonial house at 112 Ocean Avenue in Amityville, on the south shore of Long Island, New York. The house has a genuinely tragic history: on the night of November 13, 1974, 23-year-old Ronald “Butch” DeFeo Jr. shot and killed his parents and four younger siblings — six people — as they slept there. DeFeo was convicted of the murders and died in prison in 2021; that part of the story is fully documented. In December 1975, George and Kathy Lutz bought the house cheaply with their three children and moved in, but left after just 28 days, saying they had been driven out by terrifying paranormal phenomena: swarms of flies in winter, a foul green slime, cold spots and odors, a demonic red-eyed creature glimpsed by their daughter, a presence that hurled objects and that George felt waking him each night at around 3:15 a.m. — close to the estimated time of the murders. Their account, worked up by author Jay Anson into the 1977 bestseller The Amityville Horror and a hit 1979 film, became a global phenomenon, and the paranormal investigators Ed and Lorraine Warren attached themselves to it. The haunting itself, however, has steadily fallen apart. William Weber, the lawyer who had defended DeFeo, said publicly that he and the Lutzes had “created this horror story over many bottles of wine,” partly with an eye to DeFeo's appeal and to book money; investigators found that many specific claims did not check out; and crucially, the families who lived in the house after the Lutzes reported no unusual activity at all, and sued over the disruption the legend brought. The honest reading is that 112 Ocean Avenue is the site of a real and terrible crime onto which a lucrative, and largely fabricated, ghost story was grafted.

Amityville earns a case file less as a haunting than as an anatomy of one — the clearest example in the archive of how a ghost story is manufactured, monetised, and then quietly dismantled. It has everything the genre needs: a real atrocity to lend it gravity, a family who fled and never fully recanted, a bestselling book built from 45 hours of their tapes, a celebrity pair of “demonologists,” and a single iconic photograph. It also has what such stories usually lack: an insider (the lawyer) describing on the record how it was assembled, a Catholic diocese formally calling the hauntings false, and a chain of later residents who lived there uneventfully and sued to be left alone. This file keeps the one solid, terrible fact — six people were murdered here — strictly apart from the entertainment product that grew on top of it.

The documented record.

The DeFeo murders were real

The crime is fully documented. Verified Ronald DeFeo Jr. murdered six members of his family at 112 Ocean Avenue on November 13, 1974, was convicted, and died in prison in 2021 [1].

The lawyer said the haunting was invented

A central figure described it as a fabrication. Verified William Weber, DeFeo's defense attorney, stated that he and the Lutzes had concocted the horror story “over many bottles of wine,” and litigation followed among the parties [2].

Weber's admission was blunt and repeated

He put it in plain words. Verified Beyond the “bottles of wine” line, Weber said in 1988: “We took real-life incidents and transposed them… In other words, it was a hoax.” The book was assembled by author Jay Anson from roughly 45 hours of the Lutzes' audio recordings, not from independent investigation [2][4].

The Church called the hauntings false

A religious authority central to the legend rejected it. Verified Father Ralph Pecoraro — the priest fictionalised as “Father Mancuso” in the book — disputed the dramatic version of events, and in 2002 the Diocese of Rockville Centre stated the hauntings were false [3][4].

Later residents reported nothing

The “haunting” did not recur. Verified Families who lived in the house after the Lutzes — including the Cromarty family, who bought it in 1977 — reported no paranormal activity, sought to distance themselves from the legend, and litigated over the disruption and sightseers it brought [3].

The competing positions.

The believer's position holds that the Lutz family genuinely experienced a demonic haunting — supported by their consistent testimony (George Lutz maintained it was real until his death in 2006), the Warrens' 1976 investigation, and a famous photograph from that visit said to show the face of a spectral boy peering from a doorway. Claimed In this telling, the murders “opened” something in the house that drove the family out [4]. Skeptics note the “ghost boy” photo is more plausibly an investigator caught in a long exposure, and that consistent testimony is exactly what a rehearsed story produces.

The skeptical position, and this archive's, is that the haunting is a hoax or heavy embellishment built on a real tragedy for profit, given away by the lawyer's admission, the failure of specific claims to check out, and the absence of any phenomena for later occupants. Disputed The DeFeo murders are real and horrifying; the ghost story is a commercial construction layered on top. The honest summary is a documented crime and a discredited haunting [2][3].

The unanswered questions.

The exact mix of motive

How the story was assembled is only partly clear. Claimed The precise blend of financial motive, the DeFeo appeal strategy, and any genuine unease the Lutzes felt in a murder house is debated, even granting that the supernatural account is fabricated [2].

Loose ends in the DeFeo case

The crime itself has minor open questions. Claimed DeFeo gave shifting accounts over the years — a “voices told me to” defense at trial, and later claims of an accomplice — that were never substantiated and do not change his conviction. One genuine forensic oddity is that all six victims were found face-down in bed, with no signs the loud rifle shots woke anyone, which has fueled speculation but no established alternative account [1].

Why the Lutzes never fully recanted

Their own motives remain partly opaque. Claimed Even accepting the hoax, the Lutzes maintained to the end that something frightened them out of the house, and passed polygraph tests they publicised. Whether that reflects genuine unease in a fresh murder house, self-persuasion, or commitment to a profitable story is not fully resolved [2][4].

Primary material.

The Amityville record splits cleanly into a documented crime and a manufactured legend. The sources for each are unusually accessible.

The DeFeo murders (1974)

The solid, terrible foundation. Verified On November 13, 1974, Ronald “Butch” DeFeo Jr. shot his parents and four siblings as they slept at 112 Ocean Avenue; he was convicted at trial in 1975 and died in prison in 2021. This is a matter of court record, entirely separate from the ghost story [1].

The Lutzes' 28 days (1975–76)

The haunting's whole factual basis. Claimed George and Kathy Lutz bought the house for $80,000 in December 1975 and left after 28 days, describing flies, slime, cold spots, a red-eyed creature, and 3:15 a.m. wakings. Everything downstream — book, films, franchise — rests on this brief, unverified episode [4].

Jay Anson's book (1977)

How the story was actually produced. Verified Anson built the 1977 bestseller from about 45 hours of the Lutzes' audio recordings rather than independent investigation; the “based on a true story” framing carried the claims to a mass audience and seeded the 1979 film and a long franchise [4].

The Weber admission and lawsuits

The insider account of fabrication. Verified DeFeo's lawyer William Weber, after falling out with the Lutzes over money, said the horror story was concocted “over many bottles of wine” and, in 1988, called it plainly “a hoax.” A tangle of lawsuits among the parties followed [2].

The Church and the skeptics

Independent rejections of the haunting. Verified Father Ralph Pecoraro disputed the events, the Diocese of Rockville Centre called them false in 2002, and parapsychologists including Stephen Kaplan (The Amityville Horror Conspiracy) concluded the paranormal claims were groundless [3][4].

The sequence.

  1. Nov 13, 1974 Ronald DeFeo Jr. murders six family members at 112 Ocean Avenue.
  2. 1975 DeFeo is convicted; his lawyer is William Weber.
  3. Dec 1975 The Lutz family buys the house for $80,000, moves in, and leaves after 28 days reporting a haunting.
  4. 1976 Ed and Lorraine Warren investigate; the “ghost boy” photograph is taken.
  5. 1977 Jay Anson's The Amityville Horror (built from ~45 hours of Lutz tapes) becomes a bestseller; the Cromartys buy the house and report nothing.
  6. 1979 A hit film follows; Father Pecoraro denounces the hauntings.
  7. 1979/1988 Weber says the story was concocted — “it was a hoax”; lawsuits follow.
  8. 2002 The Diocese of Rockville Centre formally calls the hauntings false.

Full bibliography.

  1. Trial record of People v. Ronald DeFeo Jr. (1975) and coverage of DeFeo's imprisonment and 2021 death.
  2. William Weber's public statements on the origin of the “horror story” (the “bottles of wine” account and the 1988 “it was a hoax” remark) and the ensuing lawsuits.
  3. Accounts of the Cromarty and later families at 112 Ocean Avenue reporting no paranormal activity; Father Ralph Pecoraro and the Diocese of Rockville Centre (2002) statements that the hauntings were false.
  4. Jay Anson, The Amityville Horror (Prentice Hall, 1977); Stephen Kaplan and Roxanne Salch Kaplan, The Amityville Horror Conspiracy (1995); SPR Psi Encyclopedia, “Amityville Hoax.”

Frequently asked questions.

What is the Amityville Horror?

The claimed haunting of a house at 112 Ocean Avenue in Amityville, New York, where a family had been murdered in 1974. The new owners, the Lutz family, said they fled paranormal terror in 1975, which became a bestselling book and film.

What is the current status of this case?

Mixed. The 1974 DeFeo murders are real and documented, but the Lutz family's haunting is widely regarded as a hoax or exaggeration — the lawyer involved said it was concocted, and later residents reported nothing unusual.

Was the Amityville haunting real?

The haunting is not supported by evidence and is widely considered fabricated. DeFeo's defense lawyer, William Weber, said the story was created “over many bottles of wine,” and subsequent occupants of the house reported no paranormal activity.

Did the murders really happen?

Yes. Ronald DeFeo Jr. murdered six members of his family at the house on November 13, 1974, was convicted, and died in prison in 2021. That crime is fully documented and separate from the haunting claims.

Why is Amityville considered a hoax?

Because the people and institutions closest to it said so: the lawyer who helped create it called it a hoax, the priest and the Catholic diocese said the hauntings were false, parapsychologists found the claims groundless, and every family who lived there afterward reported nothing. The book was assembled from the Lutzes' own tapes, not independent investigation.

Is the “ghost boy” photo real?

The photograph exists — taken during the Warrens' 1976 visit — but what it shows is disputed. The most credible explanation is a member of the investigation team caught in a long-exposure night shot, not a spectral child. Like the rest of the case, it is suggestive to believers and unconvincing to investigators.

Can you visit the Amityville house?

It still stands but is a private residence; its address was changed and its distinctive quarter-round windows altered to deter sightseers. Owners have repeatedly asked the public to respect their privacy.

← Back to the archive