The Enfield Poltergeist: The Haunting Where Even the Witnesses Disagree.
For over a year in the late 1970s, a single mother and her four children in a London council house reported knockings, moving furniture, and a growling male voice that seemed to come from an eleven-year-old girl. It drew investigators, police, and reporters — and it produced something most hauntings never do: a large, contested documentary record in which the witnesses themselves don't fully agree.
AnomalyDesk is reader-supported. Articles may contain affiliate links to books and primary-document collections. Read our full funding disclosure.
What the Enfield Poltergeist is, in a paragraph.
The Enfield Poltergeist is a series of reported paranormal events at a council house on Green Street in Enfield, north London, between 1977 and 1979, in the home of Peggy Hodgson and her four children. The disturbances — knocking sounds, furniture that moved or overturned, thrown objects, and claims of one daughter, eleven-year-old Janet, being levitated — centred on the children, and the case became famous above all for a gruff male voice that appeared to issue from Janet, claiming at times to be the spirit of a former resident named “Bill Wilkins” who had died in the house. The events were investigated over many months by Maurice Grosse and Guy Lyon Playfair of the Society for Psychical Research, and were witnessed in part by neighbours, a police officer (who signed a statement about a chair she saw move), and journalists, including Daily Mirror reporters and photographers. That breadth of witnesses is what makes Enfield unusual. But the case is genuinely two-sided. The children admitted to faking some of the phenomena — Janet later said they had played tricks “to see if Mr. Grosse and Mr. Playfair would catch us,” estimating the fakery at a small fraction of events — and skeptical observers, including the SPR investigator Anita Gregory, caught the children bending spoons and behaving in ways that suggested deliberate performance. The signature “voice” was shown to be producible by Janet using her false vocal folds, a known if uncomfortable trick of the larynx. Whether anything beyond suggestion, attention-seeking, and the ordinary turbulence of a stressed household ever occurred is exactly what investigators and skeptics have argued over ever since, and the 2016 film The Conjuring 2 — which folded in the paranormal investigators Ed and Lorraine Warren, whose actual involvement at Enfield was brief — only widened the gap between the legend and the record. The honest status is a heavily documented case with admitted fakery at its core and no verified paranormal cause: not obviously a pure hoax, not remotely proven supernatural, and unusually well preserved as a record of how such cases are made.
The documented record.
The case is heavily documented
Enfield left an unusual paper trail. Verified The disturbances were investigated over many months and witnessed in part by neighbours, a police officer, and journalists, producing tapes, photographs, and statements — far more record than most hauntings [1].
The children admitted faking some events
Deliberate trickery is on the record. Verified Janet Hodgson and her sister acknowledged faking some of the phenomena; skeptical observers also caught the children performing tricks such as bending spoons [2].
The “voice” could be produced deliberately
The signature effect has a mundane mechanism. Verified The gruff voice attributed to Janet is consistent with deliberate production using the false vocal folds, a known vocal technique, undercutting it as evidence of possession [2].
The competing positions.
The position of the case's principal investigators, Grosse and Playfair, was that a genuine poltergeist was at work — that the volume, variety, and witnessing of events could not all be explained by a child's tricks, and that the admitted fakery was a minor fraction of a real phenomenon. Claimed Believers point to the police statement and the apparent sincerity of the witnesses [1].
The skeptical position, and this archive's, is that Enfield is best explained by a combination of childhood pranks, attention-seeking in a stressed single-parent household, suggestion among investigators eager to find a poltergeist, and ordinary misperception — with the documented fakery and the producible voice as the strongest clues. Disputed The case is not proven to be a pure hoax, but nothing in it has been shown to require a paranormal cause. The honest summary is a richly documented, genuinely disputed haunting with admitted deception at its heart [2].
The unanswered questions.
Which events, if any, were not faked
The line is impossible to draw cleanly. Claimed Because some events were admittedly faked and the investigation was not fully controlled, separating any genuinely anomalous incidents from tricks and misperception cannot now be done with confidence [2].
The household's full circumstances
Context is only partly recoverable. Claimed The stresses on the Hodgson family and the dynamics among the children and investigators are central to a mundane explanation but are reconstructed from partial and partisan accounts [1].
Primary material.
The record on the Enfield Poltergeist is held principally in these sources:
- Guy Lyon Playfair, This House Is Haunted — the investigators' account.
- Maurice Grosse's tapes and notes (Society for Psychical Research) — the contemporaneous record.
- The police officer's statement and journalists' accounts — outside witnesses.
- Anita Gregory's skeptical observations — the caught fakery.
- Later interviews with Janet Hodgson — the admissions of trickery.
Critical individual sources include: Playfair's book; the SPR archive; and skeptical analyses of the voice and the fakery.
The sequence.
- Aug 1977 The Hodgson family reports knockings and moving furniture; investigators are called in.
- 1977–1978 The disturbances peak; the “voice” and levitation claims emerge; police and press attend.
- 1977–1979 Skeptics catch fakery; the children later admit to faking some events.
- 1979 The activity subsides.
- 2016 The Conjuring 2 dramatizes the case, widening the gap between legend and record.
Full bibliography.
- Guy Lyon Playfair, This House Is Haunted: The Investigation of the Enfield Poltergeist.
- Maurice Grosse and the Society for Psychical Research archive of tapes and notes.
- Skeptical analyses, including Anita Gregory's observations and accounts of the producible “voice.”
- Later interviews with Janet Hodgson acknowledging some fakery.
Frequently asked questions.
What is the Enfield Poltergeist?
A series of reported paranormal events in a council house in Enfield, north London, between 1977 and 1979, centred on the Hodgson children — including knockings, moving furniture, and a gruff voice said to come from eleven-year-old Janet.
What is the current status of this case?
Disputed. The case is unusually well documented, but the children admitted faking some incidents and the famous “voice” can be produced deliberately. No paranormal cause has been verified, and investigators and skeptics still disagree.
Did the Enfield children fake it?
They admitted faking some of the events, and skeptics caught them performing tricks. How much of the case was trickery versus misperception — and whether anything was genuinely unexplained — is exactly what remains disputed.
Was the Enfield Poltergeist like the movie?
No. The Conjuring 2 dramatized and embellished the case and inflated the role of Ed and Lorraine Warren, whose actual involvement at Enfield was brief.